Flag Counter
J. Intell. Syst. Appl.
E-ISSN: 2667-6893

  • Journal of Intelligent Systems with Applications is fully committed to the Open Access Initiative under the license of CC BY 4.0 and provides free access to all articles as soon as they are published.

  • It does not request any submission and publication fees. Please, see the subtitles of "Manuscript Types" and "Preparation of Manuscript" for logical exceptions given on Instruction for Authors & Reviewers .

  • You can share, copy, redistribute, adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the papers for any purpose, even commercially. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. There is no additional restrictions.

  • The peer review from two or more reviewers is preferred to ensure objectiveness in the Journal of Intelligent Systems with Applications.

  • Reviewer reports play critical roles in maintaining the high standards in the journal. A reviewer report should comprehensively critique the paper and consist of much more than a few brief sentences. Our journal does not dictate a specific format for reviewer reports; however, a preferred format includes a Summary, Major issues, and Minor issues.

  • We encourage reviewers to help authors improve the quality of their manuscripts. The report should give constructive analysis and point-by-point recommended revisions to authors, particularly. If reviewers do not wish authors to see some specific comments, they can open a subsection of "the Confidential Comments to the Editor" in their report to add these comments.

  • Reviewers should focus on their reports to criticize the scientific aspects of the submission and the conformity of the methodology objectively. Also, they should analyze the paper utilizing whether the results support the conclusions or not. Comments may also include the novelty and the potential impact of the study.

  • At the end of their review, we ask reviewers to recommend one of the following actions: Accept as is, Consider after Minor Changes, Consider after Major Changes, Reject. However, the Editor-in-Chief has full authorization to give the overall decision, all in all.

  • Manuscripts judged to be plagiarized or self-plagiarized, based on the iThenticate® and/or Turnitin® report or any other source of information, will not be considered for publication. The 25% similarity of the article will cause it to reject without even peer review. All kinds of open-access contents (website, thesis, etc.) are considered as published works and included in the similarity checks.

  • Crossmark is an initiative to provide a standard way for readers to locate the current version of published contents. By applying the Crossmark logo, Islerya Medikal ve Bilisim Teknolojileri is committing to maintaining the content it publishes, and to alerting readers to changes if and when they occur.

  • Clicking on the Crossmark logo will tell you the current status of a document, and may also give you additional publication record information about the document. For more information on CrossMark, please visit the CrossMark site.

  • Islerya content that will have the CrossMark logo is restricted to current and future journal content and is limited to specific publication types. For general author guidelines and information, please see: Instruction for Authors & Reviewers page.

  • All articles published in our journals receive a DOI and are permanently published unless there is a legal reason to remove a content. In such a case, it is marked as WITHDRAWN or RETRACTED and its full content (other than title(s) and author(s)) is removed from both HTML and PDF files.

  • It is important to note that a withdrawn of retracted article is not 'unpublished' in order for it to be published elsewhere.

  • Corrections (or Errata) are published to alert readers to errors in the article that became apparent following the publication of the final article.

  • An article is usually only retracted at the authors' request or by the publisher in response to an institutional investigation. Articles may be retracted for several reasons, including:
    1. honest errors reported by the authors,
    2. research misconduct (data fabrication),
    3. duplicate or overlapping publication,
    4. fraudulent use of data,
    5. clear plagiarism, and
    6. unethical research.

  • For any retracted article, the reason for retraction and who is instigating the retraction will be clearly stated in the Retraction notice. The retraction notice will be linked to the retracted article (which usually remains on the site) and the article will be clearly marked as retracted (including the PDF). The reasons for retraction are usually so serious that the whole study, or large parts of it, are not appropriate for inclusion in the scientific literature anywhere.